Whack Attack…
25 April 2007…yes, the popular childrens’ game. At this point, you may be able to guess what I’m talking about.
So when you hammer one of those ugly heads into the ground, you can feel happy for ten seconds, deluding yourself about a job well done. But then:
POP
It’s back. OK, if readers still don’t know what I’m pointing to, I’ll make you aware that across the web, we are now seeing a number of sites that list ’stolen’ URLs, previously used by childlovers, or in fact anyone who had the guts to dissect the ethical and legal issues relating to them. But what don’t these shrines to intolerance pay tribute to? Let’s make a list:
- Every head that springs back up again
- Every time the victim seeks better hosting
- Every time the victim adds to their technical knowledge
- Every union borne of those victims’ weakness as individuals
- Every new convert who was drawn in by the commotion
Well sure, they might be culling off a few runts, but in the process, the breed gets stronger and wiser; not particularly any happier, but the bastards who do stay on get tougher. Not to say that it isn’t unfair, but still, the success that they claim is far from absolute, and possibly counteractive.
It’s funny, oh so very funny when a campaign called ’shutdown puellula’ gets press coverage. That its founder (who by the way, the website is not ‘ran’ by 
) would even agree to non - internet coverage, exposes either her utter stupidity, or higher motives. Shutdown Puellula?? Puellula - or at least the Puellula that they want to target, IS in effect, every new visitor to that site, not the eternally reproducible HTML that makes it so appealing!
So please… and this is for all of you, childlovers, antipeds, etc. Keep plugging away, keep exposing the truth (or your inherent lack of reasonability). Who knows, you might just spark a public debate. And that would be the gold at the end of the rainbow.
14 Responses to “Whack Attack…”
April 25th, 2007 at 6:56 am
Petra doesn’t care about Puellula; it’s just a ridiculous attempt to self-promote…. which the public are stupid enough to take seriously.
April 26th, 2007 at 12:33 am
Now now…not all of those heads are so ugly!
Personally, I’m quite perplexed at why they would have wanted to push me…
…apparently, they don’t know much of anything about me…or how absolutely stubborn, I am.
Funny thing…I was actually slowing down, and was planning on taking a break from my blogging, shortly before the first deletion (of many).
The only thing their irritation, and attempts at bullying are doing, is pulling me back into this arena, with a vendetta.
Oh…I was never leaving, mind you…I just had another, unrelated project, that I’d planned on starting.
That is now on the back burner…and I would like to thank certain members, of the Cult of Crotch Politics, for reminding me, what is most important here…and why it is so vitally important.
April 27th, 2007 at 5:11 am
Steve, it’s now virtually impossible for me to find even your blogger profile. Would it be possible for you to link it from your profile here?
Just found it:
http://www2.blogger.com/profile/15918086744290152474
I’ll make sure to link it, when I get the time to make a new links page.
BLueRibbon: Would it be possible to link one of each authors’ pages from the left - section entitled ‘links’?
April 27th, 2007 at 4:17 pm
“BLueRibbon: Would it be possible to link one of each authors’ pages from the left - section entitled ‘links’?”
Are you asking whether I can create individual user pages? If so, the answer is yes, but it would be impossible to give every user access to update the page because of the way Wordpress handles user permissions.
Can you explain exactly what you’re suggesting?
April 27th, 2007 at 8:14 pm
But what don’t these shrines to intolerance pay tribute to?
- Every head that springs back up again
usually gets cut right back off. Steve, Viamund, Raven… you? the smarter peds were able to figure it out the first time they were shut down.
- Every time the victim seeks better hosting
yeah, that really worked out well for Raven. let’s see… Blogger? gone. Google Pages? gone. LJ? gone. hey, it’s not like he wasn’t told what was going to happen. it’s not my fault if you people don’t want to listen. like i told ILGO, we can always do it the hard way. you wouldn’t be the first, and it is what we do.
- Every union borne of those victims’ weakness as individuals
if you’re talking about the one or two idiots that you’ve convinced to join you in your act/s of futility and abject stupidity, you might want to mention the numerous others that were capable of accepting the inevitability of reality.
- Every new convert who was drawn in by the commotionthey might be culling off a few runts, but in the process, the breed gets stronger and wiser;
this would be the logical result of our actions. you have a really annoying habit of belaboring the obvious, Daniel. please stop.
instead of claiming an expected result as some sort of pedo victory, why don’t you start asking yourself the important question? why?
the success that they claim is far from absolute, and possibly counteractive.
possibly? probably not.
Who knows, you might just spark a public debate. And that would be the gold at the end of the rainbow.
the public clearly doesn’t feel the need to “debate” the subject of raping children. or did your cognitive distortion get in the way of understanding that whole death penalty in Texas for possession of kiddy pr0n thing?
April 28th, 2007 at 3:54 am
Just a miscellaneous link that each author can submit to be indexed on the left of your screen (not a special page).
April 28th, 2007 at 4:38 am
Daniel, I deliberately avoided offsite links not maintained by ANU admin because I don’t have the time to read dozens of links to make sure they conform to site rules.
April 29th, 2007 at 8:20 am
Speaking of censorship, somebody actually decided to report ANU to…. wait for it…. our stat counter service.
I guess they didn’t want me to know any of their personal details. It’s such a shame…. how will I ever find out about the potentially illegal Privacy Policy at “stitches’” Carma.biz, or Mark “Jarhead John” Spence’s covert efforts to promote AZ at his Tampa Pirate website?
If you want to know how to report Carma to the FTC, please leave me a comment here with a contact (e-mail) address. If you don’t want me to publish your e-mail address, just tell me not to publish it in the comment.
April 30th, 2007 at 7:52 am
Please elaborate on the way in which she is breaking the law; I would like to see whether my action in reporting her would be vengeful or worthwhile.
Also, shouldn’t only one complaint do the trick?
April 30th, 2007 at 1:11 pm
“Please elaborate on the way in which she is breaking the law”
I will drop you an e-mail tonight.
August 24th, 2007 at 5:43 pm
Can you email me please? I have a couple of questions. Thanks!!!
August 25th, 2007 at 2:30 pm
Hi.
You can ask questions here.
admin
August 25th, 2007 at 5:37 pm
Notice: Some people appear to have published information stating that Carolyn is Stitches77, due to Carolyn’s WHOIS information being listed for an above-mentioned domain. Please note that the WHOIS information does not belong to Sticthes77.
February 28th, 2008 at 2:34 am
“yeah, that really worked out well for Raven. let’s see… Blogger? gone. Google Pages? gone. LJ? gone. hey, it’s not like he wasn’t told what was going to happen. it’s not my fault if you people don’t want to listen. like i told ILGO, we can always do it the hard way. you wouldn’t be the first, and it is what we do.”
What is your problem? What do you think of freedom of speech? Or even freedom of thought?